The Skeptical Journalists of the MSM
A number of bloggers have pointed out how the NY Times chose to run an op-ed by Fatina Abdrabboh which reached a new low, even for the Times. Michelle Malkin called it the Stupidest. Op-ed. Ever. Over at Ankle Biting Pundits, however, they show us why the internet and search engines are so great.
Curious how a complete unknown can get an op-ed in the Times of such worthless quality, they looked for other news articles involving Miss Abdrabboh. Wow, so many! It almost seems like journalists looking for a story that criticizes the US need only call an activist lawyer with terror contacts who provides his sister to provide the quotes they want. Surely this can't be how MSM journalism really works?!
Read the whole thing and remember how often journalists try to claim that they are skeptical.
Curious how a complete unknown can get an op-ed in the Times of such worthless quality, they looked for other news articles involving Miss Abdrabboh. Wow, so many! It almost seems like journalists looking for a story that criticizes the US need only call an activist lawyer with terror contacts who provides his sister to provide the quotes they want. Surely this can't be how MSM journalism really works?!
Read the whole thing and remember how often journalists try to claim that they are skeptical.
posted by Stan at 7:51 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home