In defense of Ann Coulter
A great review of Ann Coulter's book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, by Richard Kirk. I fully agree with his take on her writing style:
She's not as nasty as a lot of liberals and she is unqestionably more accurate.
What undercuts the liberals' case against Coulter on this score, however, is their own (not always tacit) endorsement of vile epithets that are regularly directed against President Bush and his supporters by the likes of Cindy Sheehan, Michael Moore, and a gaggle of celebrity politicos. Coulter employs the same linguistic standard against liberals (with a touch of humor) that they regularly use (with somber faces and dogmatic conviction) when they accuse conservatives of being racist homophobes who gladly send youngsters to war under false pretences to line the pockets of Halliburton executives. Hate-speech of this stripe is old-hat for leftists.
Until Air America, Helen Thomas, and most Democrat constituencies alter their rhetoric, I see no reason for conservatives to denounce Coulter for using, more truthfully, the same harsh language that leftists have employed, with no regard for accuracy, since the time of Lenin.
She's not as nasty as a lot of liberals and she is unqestionably more accurate.
1 Comments:
And, hey, she's a plagerist to boot.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002765299
Post a Comment
<< Home