MSM Credibility

The ridiculous, over-heated coverage of Karl Rove and the Plame investigation is noteworthy. Not because it shows how biased the MSM is (although they are). Or even because it reminds us of how hopelessly partisan they are.

The coverage is instructive because it shows how how pathetic they are; how much they lack substance. Admittedly, this is just another in a long line of examples, but one has to ask how they expect to retain even a shred of credibility with the coverage they provide.

The Rove coverage is the insanity of the Times' jihad against Augusta National for Martha Burk extended industry-wide. Journalists as lemmings -- dashing their credibility on the rocks.