Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Treason? NY Times wants to help.

Great news! Beldar is back. And he has a great post on the latest development in the efforts by the NY Times to facilitate criminality in general and terrorism specifically:
Here it is in two sentences: The FBI was prevented from freezing terrorists' assets and catching terrorists because somebody leaked what they were about to do to the New York Times, and the NYT proceeded to warn the terrorists themselves! Now the NYT says that because it was just promoting the "public's right to know" and the First Amendment, its phone company should be immune from having to give evidence to permit a grand jury to decide whether any crimes were committed as part of this debacle.

And here it is in a mere ten words: Someone committed treason, and the NYT is okay with that.


Post a Comment

<< Home